The Plastic Brain

Has Lamarckism Evolved by Darwinian Selection?

Leave a comment

I have had a long-standing interest in Lamarckism. Unlike Creationism, Lamarckism is a testable, scientific theory of evolution. Like Creationism, it has been rejected by the vast majority evolutionary biologists. However, I delight in the possibilities that arise from a competing theory. What if it were true? The thought of over-turning dogma, even something I love as much as Darwin’s theory of Natural Selection, makes me giddy.

And so, I have always had a soft spot for anything with a whiff of Lamarckism. Which I why I was surprised that I had not heard of Ted Steele before. This is especially galling as he hails from my home town of Adelaide.

From Steele’s Wikipedia entry:

Ted Steele developed the theory of reverse transcription from the somatic (body) cells to the germline (reproductive cells). This reverse transcription process enables characteristics or bodily changes acquired during a lifetime to be written back into the DNA and passed on to subsequent generations. This is what used to be known as neo-Lamarckism.[1] Steel’s theory provided the first mechanism to explain Lamarckian evolution: when successful somatic (body) cell changes occur due to environmental changes, copies of the copious new messenger-RNA that have been produced by the successful cells are picked up by harmless retroviruses acting as gene shuttles and transported across the tissue barrier – theWeismann Barrier – to the germline. Finally, the new genetic information is integrated into the DNA by a process involving reverse transcription. This process of writing or translating new information into the DNA provides the essential precursor to acquired changes being passed on to progeny; to the next generation, thereby demonstrating Lamarckian inheritance of acquired characters. Darwinian natural selection then goes to work on the progeny and subsequent generations: those fit for survival do so and those not fit die out. This recombination of Darwin and Lamarck by Steele has been described as meta-Lamarckism[2].

This would suggest that Darwinian evolution has selected for genomes that allow this sort of process to go on, and that it may, in fact, be advantageous.

I’m happy to concede that Lamarck didn’t work out the theory of evolution, but neither did Darwin. Although I suspect Darwin’s natural selection of inherited variation will remain the core of evolutionary theory, it’s fun to see a bit of Lamarckism thrown into the mix. Who knows what else is yet to be added?

Advertisements

Author: Rogan Tinsley

Biology, science and maths teacher with a PhD in Neuroscience and passion for education.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s